<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Limitations of Traditional Telescopes	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://journalofgeocentriccosmology.org/2024/05/07/the-limitations-of-traditional-telescopes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://journalofgeocentriccosmology.org/2024/05/07/the-limitations-of-traditional-telescopes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2025 02:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dobby		</title>
		<link>https://journalofgeocentriccosmology.org/2024/05/07/the-limitations-of-traditional-telescopes/#comment-188</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dobby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2024 07:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://journalofgeocentriccosmology.org/?p=16837#comment-188</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://journalofgeocentriccosmology.org/2024/05/07/the-limitations-of-traditional-telescopes/#comment-92&quot;&gt;Will&lt;/a&gt;.

Need to ask yourself though is it the true focus dont be deceived study the optics you will get your answer what&#039;s in focus and what&#039;s not.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://journalofgeocentriccosmology.org/2024/05/07/the-limitations-of-traditional-telescopes/#comment-92">Will</a>.</p>
<p>Need to ask yourself though is it the true focus dont be deceived study the optics you will get your answer what&#8217;s in focus and what&#8217;s not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Will		</title>
		<link>https://journalofgeocentriccosmology.org/2024/05/07/the-limitations-of-traditional-telescopes/#comment-92</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://journalofgeocentriccosmology.org/?p=16837#comment-92</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is hilarious. All of my telescopes have zero issues focusing on objects from a few hundred feet away all the way out to the stars.

Telescopes also don&#039;t have particularly &quot;high magnification.&quot; Their main purpose is to collect more light, and most of my observing is done in the 30-60x magnification range.

No matter the size or focal length of telescope you are using, stars can always be resolved as a pinpoint provided your optics are properly collimated.

Finally, when using optics, we generally try to focus things. That means turning the focus ring until the object is as small as possible in the viewfinder.

This reads like the author has never used a telescope or a camera. And you guys claim this is &quot;peer reviewed?&quot; ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is hilarious. All of my telescopes have zero issues focusing on objects from a few hundred feet away all the way out to the stars.</p>
<p>Telescopes also don&#8217;t have particularly &#8220;high magnification.&#8221; Their main purpose is to collect more light, and most of my observing is done in the 30-60x magnification range.</p>
<p>No matter the size or focal length of telescope you are using, stars can always be resolved as a pinpoint provided your optics are properly collimated.</p>
<p>Finally, when using optics, we generally try to focus things. That means turning the focus ring until the object is as small as possible in the viewfinder.</p>
<p>This reads like the author has never used a telescope or a camera. And you guys claim this is &#8220;peer reviewed?&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
