Abstract
This paper investigates the theory that the widely accepted globe model of the Earth was derived by wrapping a flat Earth around a sphere to match the curvature observed in human vision. We analyze the scientific basis for this theory and explore historical and observational evidence that supports a flat Earth perspective. The conclusion posits that the globe model’s creation was influenced by human perception rather than physical reality.
Introduction
The shape of the Earth has been a topic of debate for centuries. While the spherical model is prevalent in mainstream science, alternative theories, such as the flat Earth model, challenge this notion. One compelling theory suggests that the globe model was constructed by wrapping a flat Earth around a ball, aligning with the curvature of the human field of vision. This paper examines this theory and its implications.
Human Field of Vision
The human field of vision spans approximately 120-130 degrees horizontally and 60-70 degrees vertically. This wide field of view shapes our perception of the environment, leading to an apparent curvature over long distances. This visual effect may have influenced early cartographers and astronomers in their conceptualization of the Earth’s shape.
Revisiting Scientific Evidence
The evidence traditionally cited to support a spherical Earth can be reinterpreted within the flat Earth framework:
- Geometric Measurements: The supposed curvature of the Earth at 8 inches per mile squared can be re-examined. Observations over large bodies of water, such as the Bedford Level experiment, have shown that the surface remains level over significant distances, challenging the curvature model.
- Astronomical Observations: The behavior of celestial bodies can be explained through alternative models, such as the flat Earth perspective, where stars and planets move in circular paths above the Earth. The apparent sinking of ships over the horizon can be attributed to perspective and atmospheric refraction.
- Satellite Imagery: While satellite images are presented as evidence of a spherical Earth, the interpretation of these images is subject to scrutiny. The possibility of image manipulation and the limitations of perspective from space warrant reconsideration.
- Circumnavigation: The ability to travel around the Earth does not inherently prove its sphericity. Flat Earth models propose alternative explanations, such as circular navigation around the North Pole, which can account for circumnavigation experiences.
- Gravity: The concept of gravity as a force pulling objects towards a central point is challenged by flat Earth proponents. Instead, they propose alternative theories, such as density and buoyancy, to explain the behavior of objects.
The Theory of Wrapping a Flat Earth
The theory that the globe model was created by wrapping a flat Earth around a sphere to match the human field of vision’s curvature suggests that early modelers aimed to replicate observed visual effects. This perspective posits that the globe model’s acceptance was influenced by the limits of human perception rather than objective measurements.
Analysis and Conclusion
The theory that the globe model was derived by wrapping a flat Earth around a ball aligns with the notion that human perception played a crucial role in shaping our understanding of the Earth. While mainstream science supports the spherical Earth model, it is essential to critically examine the evidence and consider alternative interpretations.
The concept of a flat Earth remains a viable perspective when historical observations and human vision are taken into account. The globe model’s creation may indeed reflect an attempt to align with perceived visual curvature, rather than an accurate representation of physical reality. Thus, the flat Earth theory, supported by critical analysis and reinterpretation of evidence, presents a compelling alternative to the conventional spherical model.
References
- Dubay, Eric. “The Flat Earth Conspiracy.” Lulu.com, 2014.
- Sargent, Mark. “Flat Earth Clues: The Sky’s the Limit.” CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2016.
- Rowbotham, Samuel Birley. “Zetetic Astronomy: Earth Not a Globe.” 1865.
- Shenton, Charles K. Johnson. “The Flat Earth Society Newsletter.” 1970s-1990s.
- Davidson, Gerardus. “A Short History of the Flat Earth.” 2017.